And this is just a side note: this philosophy also coincides with many other areas, for example in basic religious views, but also in the so-called Western conception of law and state: one "is" not a criminal, a murderer, a "depraved subject", one "is" also not an "Übermensch" just as one is not a "subhuman". Only concrete deeds can be determined as wrong and, if necessary, sanctioned in a legal system according to established and democratically agreed rules. Then you may have to pay a fine for something you have actually done. But it does not change what you are: a free citizen (at least after serving a prison sentence, for example).

It speaks volumes about the kind of rulers we are currently exposed to and about the state of our societies, that socially and politically this distinction between "being" and "doing" is becoming more and more diluted. This is a characteristic of totalitarian dictatorships, where a distinction is made between valuable and unvaluable life. It is a crime.

I think so, that way round. Because you are a good man you try to do the right things. Just often you probably fail, and some other people, well, I mean some people just tend to be unlucky with the things they do, lol, whatever. But still they can be good people. But you’re not a good person the other way round is what I think, like because you are successful. My house my car, my woman, my money… That’s not it, I think. And we all know these hypocrites literally advertising all the politically correct things they did, but in truth all they want is status.